It’s already a low bar when discussing the journalistic ethics of a newspaper founded, and run, by a cult leader.
But today the Washington Times quite possibly lowered that bar even further into the ever-swirling cesspool that is the Republican propaganda machine.
Today, in a putative “news story,” the Washington Times flipped out, in rather bigoted and biased terms, over the fact that Kristin Beck, a former Navy SEAL who came out as transgender after leaving the military, has been doing presentations at a variety of events at various US intelligence agencies and the Pentagon.
Transgender former Navy SEAL Kristin Beck.
And you know how gullible spies and generals are. We simply must not permit “transgenders,” as the Washington Times so affectionately calls them (the term is “transgender,” and it’s an adjective, not a noun), to spread their insidious lies to our apparently easily-confused defense establishment.
If one transgender woman poses this much of a threat to the most expensive military the world has ever seen, then maybe we should all just pack it in and spend the money elsewhere.
(You can buy Kristin’s book, “Warrior Princess: A U.S. Navy Seal’s Journey to Coming Out Transgender
One need only read the first five paragraphs to get the full flavor of the Times’ “report” by Bill Gertz:
I actually had to go back and make sure that this wasn’t an editorial — and if it were, it would still be rather outrageous. But this poses a “news” piece?
Oh, and if the Times really wants to go there, the biggest homo-lover at the Pentagon in the last 65 years was Bush-appointed Sec. Robert Gates, the man who personally oversaw the lifting of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. So, if you have a problem with it, go talk to the president you put in office.
Just to back up a moment. While the ban on gays and lesbians serving in the military was lifted, a second ban still exists on transgender service members. It was under an entirely different section than the ban on gays. Beck, although only recently having come out as trans, has been doing a lot of very-public work trying to educate folks about who trans people really are. And the trans community couldn’t ask for a better spokesperson than a former Navy SEAL. It’s hard to question her patriotism, judgment, or motivation.
The Washington Times is right about one thing: Beck does pose a danger. To bigots.
my classmate’s half-sister makes $73 an hour on the
computer . She has been out of work for seven months but last month her check
was $19134 just working on the computer for a few hours. navigate to this
web-site Cashduties.COM
Since the Moonies pushed it to the crazy right, the rest of the right wing / Repuke machine has happily quoted it. It has been useful to them.
Because they have given $50 million to senior Republican and Democratic Senators and Presidential candidates over the past 30 years.
Well you knew most of it LOL
Holycow, I didn’t realize that!
My Uncle
Noah recently got an almost new green Chrysler 200 Sedan by working parttime
at home online… website link
www．ⓦⓞⓡⓚⓢ77．com
My Uncle Riley got an almost
new red GMC Canyon just by some parttime working online with a laptop. visit
their website Fiscalpost.COM
Wow! There is just too much self-aggrandizing delusion here, it is really just impossible to take it seriously, so I won’t. Have funny in La La Land, I mean at Church. ROTFLMAO at you!
Important reserch, sostain reserch:
From the moment, that panasonic increase 25,6% of rendiment, i undestand it is possible to increase until 100%, with the some easy of mix two component. See more on elektron28701.xoom.it
http://www.pv-tech.org/news/back_contact_hit_solar_cell_from_panasonic_pushes_efficiency_record_to_25.6
Why is a newspaper owned by the Moonies treated with any credibility?
Regarding “Moonies sold it in 2010” – wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that the Unification Church sold it… ?
As far as can be ascertained, it’s still owned by moonies and is still a moonie mouthpiece. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times
If you’re trying to not use the word “moonie” like “trandgenders,” that would be a funny literary device complementary to the thread, but even as such you’d be being too good, and splitting the finest hair ever if you call not being directly owned by the Unification Church to being privately held by that offspring of Moon himself, different in any way.
It’s a moonie rag that’s never made a dime, than can barely be given away, that nobody respects enough to put under their parakeet, and that was deliberately founded to be a lobbying instrument upon our government, upon our country, by a foreign agent with delusions of Godhood and dreams of Armageddon.
Every ‘journalist’ who works for it is a whore, and not just the honest and honorable type of whore who can and does exist, but the type who doesn’t care that they work for a krazy propaganda machine with an agenda so far from what real journalism serves there aren’t enough degrees in a circle to describe it, even including the infinite fractions of points within the degrees… 180 doesn’t work when analogizing the circles within circles of wrong in this equation.
my father
inlaw just got a new Suzuki Kizashi by working parttime off of a pc online.
look here
☭☭☭ ☭�☭☭ ☭☭☭ ☭�☭☭ ☭☭☭
www．ＷＯRＫＳ77．com
Josiah . although Jacqueline `s stori is surprising,
last week I bought themselves a Chrysler from having made $5060 thiss month
and-in excess of, 10/k last-month . it’s realy the easiest-work I have ever
done . I started this 4 months ago and pretty much straight away was bringin in
at least $78 per-hour . why not look here Cashduties.COM
Geez, the extract of the article reads like The Daily Caller. So I checked out the actual article. How can anybody take this rag seriously?
And then they add links to war porn galleries in the side-bar. Hard to guess what kind of people we’re dealing with here, huh? But what’s both amusing and telling is this:
Could anyone have made that any more propagandish? Used a couple of nutjob-bait terms in there – like “Politically correct” and “social engineering.”
To add insult to injury, there’s this:
First off, nice sentence structure for a “newspaper.” So “transgenders” are reduced to being “terms”, not people? I mean, aside from being just incredibly inept writing, it comes out as calling people “terms.” WTF?
I see they also go with the old trope of Obama “imposing law”. Good Godfrey, they don’t even try to hide their propagandizing.
And this is what passes for right-wing “journalism”. Well, at least they mentioned her book. Not that regular readers of this crapsheet would ever buy it.
In a war zone, I would much rather have her at my back than the entire Washington Times staff. Even with the owners (though there would be a little schadenfreude with their predicament.)
Funny, I always put them on the same level as the National Enquirer and The Globe….
No I think it is shitty, shittier, shittiest
Hand cannon???
The Washington Times is the Anti-American religious reich’s version of The Völkischer Beobachter and Der Stürmer,
I’m intrigued by the level of factual ignorance the Times displayed unless, in the great scheme of things, they’re on the same playing field as the check-out line gossip sheets at the grocery store. Then it’s just Fantasy Island all the way.
How to conjugate US corporate media — rag, raggier, raggiest.
Moonies sold it in 2010. Still a rag.
Is the Times still a Moonie rag?