Earlier today, three North Carolina couples filed a federal lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s religious exemption for public officials who object to same-sex marriages.
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v Hodges, the State of North Carolina passed a law exempting public officials with religious objections from the marriage process when the couple is of the same sex. The law was passed after the state legislature overrode a veto from Governor Pat McCrory.
Gay marriage via Shutterstock
Under the law, local magistrates, who sometimes preside over marriages, and some register of deeds officials, who issue marriage licenses, can opt out of their responsibilities as public officials if they have a “sincerely held religious objection” to the marriage in question. If such an objection is raised, one of their co-workers who does not have such an objection must fill in for them.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit argue that this law places the religious beliefs of public officials above the public functions they are charged with executing, a violation of Church/State separation. As Chris Sgro of Equality North Carolina added in a statement, the law “targets same-sex couples directly for discrimination and in the process also restricts access to taxpayer-funded government services for all North Carolinians.”
It’s worth noting that this kind of exemption is exactly what Kentucky Governor-elect Matt Bevin plans to enact “right away” via executive order when he takes office in January. Kentucky’s current governor, Steve Beshear, had fought a lawsuit from Kim Davis requesting a similar exemption, in part because it would set a highly problematic precedent in which public officials can pick and choose which laws they will uphold — despite having taken an oath to execute all of the laws the government charges them with executing. North Carolina’s law, and Bevin’s planned executive order, allow agents of the state to put the priorities of their faith above the priorities of their government.
The First Amendment is pretty clear in saying that they shouldn’t be allowed to do so.
Well, “reader view” tackles 95% of the problem. So, I guess we should stick with that.
It varies. Last I looked there was one for $250, which isn’t out of the question, but the real issue is that there’s no guarantee that once you buy it it will actually work. If you’re buying off the shelf, you don’t get to test them out.
Hey Emjayaya, does Android offer “reader view” in the articles? While it don’t help the homepage it makes all articles white background with big, fat black text that be sized up or down from there. I use it all the time so check it out.
How much would a better one cost?
I am currently using a free mobile plugin because the better ones cost money — money that I don’t currently have. Believe it or not, blogging isn’t exactly easy money.
Not holding my breath for you to take back that snide jab at my phone.
Besides being microscopic and using light blue type on white and not expanding, your mobile version displays titles withnospacesbetweenthewords. Have you ever even tried using it with an Android phone? Maybe you can borrow one. I assume you all have the latest $600 iphone. Maybe it works on those.